Eria Gayrimenkul Yatırım
Eria Gayrimenkul Yatırım
- Foster + Partners (original concept)
- kr2b Architecture (redesign & construction documents)
Mixed-Use, Office
Completed 07/2018
approx. 65.000 m²
approx. 124 m
Sound facade decisions start with a clear understanding of the project’s starting point.
Decision criteria and priorities
Facade design for statutory approval develops an existing facade concept for the project’s approval and coordination context.
Technical facade design develops an agreed facade solution into coordinated technical information for implementation.
Facade specifications and tender documentation translate developed facade design into clear technical requirements for tendering and bid comparison.
During technical tender evaluation, Priedemann compares submitted facade bids with the previously defined requirements and tender documents.
After a facade manufacturer is appointed, Priedemann reviews its shop drawings, system planning and technical submittals against the agreed design basis.
Priedemann supports the execution of facade mock-ups during the planning phase, ahead of the usual appointment of a facade manufacturer. For physical mock-ups, Priedemann helps prepare tests, takes part in testing and reviews test reports. For visual mock-ups, Priedemann supports comparison with design requirements. The aim is greater planning and execution confidence at an earlier project stage.
The supervision of assembly and installation is particularly important for us, to ensure the agreed quality. Our principle is that deviations from the agreed planning must be identified at an early stage, documented and the implementation corrected. This controlling refers both to production and manufacturing as well as to the assembly on the building site:
Regular inspection of production and assembly in the factoryValue Engineering is part of the Priedemann DNA. We ask about the motives and objectives of a project: Which functions should the facade fulfill, which requirements? What is the design requirement? Based on this, we develop alternatives and evaluate these options with regard to any possible improvements that can be made to the overall solution. At the same time, we take into account the criteria of the entire building life cycle.
The aim is to provide a transparent basis for making decisions in order to make them easier for our clients. This minimizes risks, bad planning and poor decisions. Simultaneously we improve the calculability of the overall project and save time in planning and execution. We see value engineering as a fundamental component in overall planning which helps optimize all processes and procedures.
Facades need to remain cleanable, maintainable and repairable throughout their service life.
Access and replacement as design considerations