Continent
Europe (57)
Asia (31)
Africa (2)
Americas (3)
Country
Azerbaijan (1)
Bulgaria (1)
China (1)
Germany (45)
India (2)
Canada (1)
Qatar (6)
Kuwait (3)
Lebanon (1)
Mauritius (1)
Panama (1)
Russia (7)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Czechia (1)
Turkey (7)
Hungary (1)
United Arab Emirates (6)
United States of America (1)
Egypt (1)
United Kingdom (2)
Building Function
Education (4)
Office (54)
Health (4)
Shopping (23)
High-Rise (22)
Hotel (14)
Culture (9)
Mixed-Use (29)
Sport (1)
Transport (8)
Residential (14)
Key Feature
Unitized Curtain Wall (46)
Stick System (54)
Double Skin (11)
Glass Fin (5)
Rain Screen (32)
Exhaust Air (3)
Roof (21)
Energy (8)
Security (3)
Sun Protection (34)
Geometry (16)
Innovation (8)
Main Material
Ceramic (8)
Composite (12)
Concrete (5)
Glass (71)
Metal (53)
Membrane (2)
Stone (18)
Wood (3)
Other (5)
Height
Up to 50m (49)
Up to 100m (19)
Up to 200m (15)
Up to 300m (8)
Higher (2)
Our Services
Research & Development (10)
Consultancy (80)
Engineering (15)
Specials (44)
Continuous Support (4)
Refurbishment (12)
Status
Competition (0)
In Planning (4)
Under Construction (3)
Completed (91)
Not Built (0)

Federation Tower, Moscow


Map 

Client

nps tchoban voss


Owner / Developer

Mirax Group


Architect
  • nps tchoban voss
  • Architekten Schweger & Partner

Building Function

Office


Status

Completed in 2014


Facade Scale

approx. 50.000 m²


Height

approx. 374 m


Technical Features
  • Tower 1: 242 m
  • Tower 2: 374 m
  • Curved facade
  • Unitized curtain wall
  • Interior sunshade
  • Skylight

View location in Google Maps

We provided

Consultancy

Sound facade decisions start with a clear understanding of the project’s starting point.

  • Priedemann organises the available project information, design intent, use, and facade-related technical and external requirements.
  • Together with the project participants, objectives, priorities, constraints and unresolved questions are made visible.
  • This creates a reliable basis for the next design steps and for decisions before the facade concept is developed in greater detail.
  • Priedemann identifies and structures the project information, requirements, objectives and constraints relevant to facade planning.
  • These may include design intent, use, technical and energy-related requirements, local conditions, and quality, cost and programme objectives.
  • Unresolved questions, dependencies and competing priorities are made explicit and translated into clear decision criteria.
  • This creates a reliable basis for early facade design and subsequent planning.
  • The subjects reviewed and documented depend on the project stage and agreed scope.

Decision criteria and priorities

  • Not every facade requirement has the same priority within a project.
  • Design intent, use, technical requirements, local conditions, quality, cost and programme objectives can influence one another.
  • Establishing the project basis therefore also means structuring these requirements and making potential conflicts visible.
  • The resulting criteria provide a shared basis against which later options and decisions can be assessed consistently.

Early facade design begins once the strategic objectives and principal requirements of a project are sufficiently understood for possible directions to be developed.

  • Priedemann translates this basis into options for design, materials and construction, considered alongside technical requirements and project-specific constraints.
  • The comparison makes differences and trade-offs visible, and a preferred direction is developed further.
  • The purpose is not to complete the technical detailing, but to establish a traceable design basis for subsequent development.
  • The criteria, sketches and documentation included depend on the project and agreed appointment.
  • Early facade design develops possible design, material and construction directions from the project objectives and requirements.
  • Priedemann considers relevant facade types, principle details, interfaces, and technical and operational requirements.
  • Options are described clearly and compared against agreed criteria.
  • This allows architectural intent, technical viability and project-specific implications to be assessed together.
  • The outcome is a robust design direction that provides a basis for subsequent system development and technical design.
Let's talk about your project